The question of language is not functional vs imperative. Rather Operational Semantic vs Denotational Semantic.
I am trying to evaluate GO language for a project I am interested in. It appears that there are some “go gotcha” constructs that one needs to be aware of when programming in go language.
A useful blog post on the topic is: How to avoid Go gotchas. The intersting part is:
Remember, “gotchas are .. valid constructs .. but is counter-intuitive”? That is it. You have only two options:
“fix” the language fix the intuition Second is actually would be better seen as build the intuition. Once you have a clear mental image of how slices or interfaces work under the hood, it’s almost impossible to run into those mistakes.
So, it worked for me and probably will work for others. That’s why I decided to gather that basic knowledge of some Go internals in this post and help people to build the intuition about an in-memory representation of different things.
This demonstrates the fundamental problem with programming languages that are defined by their operational semantic. To make sense of a code you need to have a “clear mental” image of HOW the program runs not WHAT, or the meaning of the instruction.
Conal Elliot’s presentation covers the topic more in depth.